Who's alive now?

In  "A book about the classic Avis advertising campaign of the 60s," (yes, that's really the title), the author details not only the beginnings of the "When you're #2, you try harder" Avis philosophy (first presented in the ad at left),  but also its decline.

As a competitive strategy, it probably seemed bulletproof to some; after all, when you're not challenging the market leader for the #1 position, how much of a response should they really make?  Conventional marketing wisdom says that when you dominate the marketplace as Hertz did, acknowledging the competition only enhances their status.

And for over four years, Avis used their ads to both raise their image and indirectly undermine the perceptions of Hertz (never even mentioning Hertz by name), without a real counterattack.

That, however, changed in 1967, when Hertz switched agencies to Carl Alley, Inc., a shop as revered for its creative approach to advertising as Avis' agency, Doyle Dane Bernbach.  To stop Avis' slow erosion of its market share, Hertz began an aggressive campaign that turned its rival's #2 claim back on them, with ads like the one at right.  

When DDB head Bill Bernbach saw the first of these new Hertz newspaper ads, he reportedly threw down the New York Times in anger, saying, "As of today, they are alive and we are not.  They are alive and we just died."  And indeed, the Avis "We Try Harder" campaign was fatally wounded; it limped along for a while longer, but was replaced by more conventional messages in 1968.

I'm couldn't help thinking about all this in the context of the Apple-PC rivalry.  For several years now, Apple has taken shots at its much larger competitor with its popular "I'm an Apple/I'm a PC" series of TV commercials.  Though the spots highlight actual advantages of the Apple computers, its true appeal has always been in its depiction of the Apple as a young, creative individual as opposed to the PC avatar, a paunchy, middle-aged Organization Man (who also, not coincidentally I'm sure, brings to mind Microsoft's Bill Gates):



Much like Hertz, Microsoft had refused to directly engage the upstart Apple -- until recently, when they finally responded (after some amusing but quite pointless spots with Jerry Seinfeld) with a series of commercials that both reinforces the ubiquity of the PC, but more importantly, rehabilitates its image by forcefully rejecting the stereotype pushed by Apple:



Is it working? Apple seems to be continuing with their spots, but will Bill Bernbach's assertion -- "As of today, they are alive and we are dead." -- ultimately apply to Apple's campaign as well? 
(NOTE: With this entry, Deconstruction On Madison Avenue resumes publishing -- albeit on a bit more irregular schedule. Thanks for coming back.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fly Me Again

Image
We referenced this ad campaign in an earlier post , but it really deserves its own entry. This memorable/notorious American Airlines campaign appeared back in 1971, at the behest of National Airlines'  Lewis Maytag  who sought to modernize the airline and the image of its stewardesses.  (Yes, they were still known as stewardesses back then.) At the time, airline advertising had frequently based their messages on the friendliness and attentiveness of their stewardesses, but previous efforts tended more toward the chauvinistic end of sexism spectrum, treating them more like Ladies Of The Air than ladies of the night: (Despite the caveman ethos of the headline and illustration, if you click on the ad to enlarge it and read the copy, you'll see it's actually about men being so beguiled by their stewardesses that they often took them for wives -- after first mistaking wives for servants, I suppose.) But now, with the sexual revolution and women's liberation in full swing (an...
Read more

I wanted to like this ad, I really did

Image
When I first came across it, I (wrongly) assumed it was the work of Doyle Dane Bernbach, using a very minimalist layout to catch attention and evoke emotion, sort of like they did with the Polaroid ads in the ‘60s . No logo, just a simple headline, and an intriguing illustration that tells you nothing about the product, only the elation it will inspire in the woman in the your life. What an incredible way to portray a woman leaping into the arms of her man, I thought, showing only what’s necessary to imply the situation, spurring the reader to imagine the embrace, the eyes, the kiss.   Brilliant, I thought. Then I read the headline.    “Wear an Arrow Shirt and you'll simply sweep her off her feet!”   No.   No, I don’t believe this ad, even for a minute.    The only way to sell this scenario is if the emotion implied feels true. Even in 1949, it’s hard to imagine anyone got this excited about a dress shirt. Unless he just got home from the service and t...
Read more

Not just hyperbole

Image
Maybe you've seen this classic Guinness poster, created back in the '30s and assumed that it was nothing more than silly hyperbole: And you'd be partly right. The idea is actually based on the high iron content of Guinness (probably from the water used), though of course, the benefit of this is exaggerated to an unbelievable extent in the poster above. That didn't stop the image from becoming so iconic that a pint Guinness became known as a "girder." The image also inspired this parody from Heinekin some 40 years later (though its likely that many young drinkers never realized its source), that both fit the idea into its own ad format and made the male sexual subtext even more implicit: (Best not to take any of this too seriously, though. In reality, the pictures in the Heinken ad would have to be reversed.)
Read more