Beautiful concept

It may seem a bit cruel to pick on Marty Feldman just to make your point, but the pairing was inspired in more ways than one:

Comments

ANGELA COBB said…
I don't know if it's cruel, just an inspired concept. I've always loved the ad myself, as a fan of Feldman. It's rather clever. And the things that they right in the ad are cute. Good stuff. Fun ad.

~Angela Cobb
May 23, 2008 at 8:33 AM
Craig McNamara said…
I'm sure they needed Feldman's blessing to go with the ad, just as I'm sure that Feldman was aware of (and comfortable with) the source of much of his appeal. Still, it is a little...I don't know, cold...to see a company that has gone to so much effort to give itself such a charming personality run an ad that keys off of making fun of somebody else's appearance. It's definitely clever, and obviously hard to ignore, but VW and Doyle Dane Bernbach have done better ads.
May 23, 2008 at 11:28 AM
ANGELA COBB said…
Oh of course, I agree. And I'm sure even with how comfortable he seemed with it, Feldman had to be somewhat insecure with his appearance, I mean...I don't know it'd make sense. Also, his appearance wasn't all of his appeal, a huge comic talent, mind, and great writing ability were another bit.

But yeah...clever. And I suppose though, as you've said...it is a bit odd. Because come to think of it, you never really see any other ads that do so much capitalize on mocking someone's appearance. Good point.
May 23, 2008 at 9:26 PM
Anonymous said…
I preferred the lunar module execution which says the same thing in fewer words with a timeless visual.

(Though David Abbott wrote the Feldman ad which is a bit like slating God’s handiwork.)
May 28, 2008 at 4:59 AM
Craig McNamara said…
Anthony, thanks for bringing up the Lunar Module concept, too -- "It's ugly but it gets you there." -- I remembered that one, too, as one that made the same point in a less personal (and probably more relevant) fashion. Maybe it says something about our culture being a bit more intolerant of insensitivity back then. I can imagine VW running the same ad with, say, Phyllis Diller, but I can't think of celebrity today who'd be comfortable with the implication of being unattractive. [The only possible example that comes to mind is that show, "Ugly Betty," and there, the main character isn't really ugly, she's only being judged against the impossible standards of the fashion industry.
May 28, 2008 at 1:57 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not just hyperbole

Image
Maybe you've seen this classic Guinness poster, created back in the '30s and assumed that it was nothing more than silly hyperbole: And you'd be partly right. The idea is actually based on the high iron content of Guinness (probably from the water used), though of course, the benefit of this is exaggerated to an unbelievable extent in the poster above. That didn't stop the image from becoming so iconic that a pint Guinness became known as a "girder." The image also inspired this parody from Heinekin some 40 years later (though its likely that many young drinkers never realized its source), that both fit the idea into its own ad format and made the male sexual subtext even more implicit: (Best not to take any of this too seriously, though. In reality, the pictures in the Heinken ad would have to be reversed.)
Read more

Fly Me Again

Image
We referenced this ad campaign in an earlier post , but it really deserves its own entry. This memorable/notorious American Airlines campaign appeared back in 1971, at the behest of National Airlines'  Lewis Maytag  who sought to modernize the airline and the image of its stewardesses.  (Yes, they were still known as stewardesses back then.) At the time, airline advertising had frequently based their messages on the friendliness and attentiveness of their stewardesses, but previous efforts tended more toward the chauvinistic end of sexism spectrum, treating them more like Ladies Of The Air than ladies of the night: (Despite the caveman ethos of the headline and illustration, if you click on the ad to enlarge it and read the copy, you'll see it's actually about men being so beguiled by their stewardesses that they often took them for wives -- after first mistaking wives for servants, I suppose.) But now, with the sexual revolution and women's liberation in full swing (an
Read more

I wanted to like this ad, I really did

Image
When I first came across it, I (wrongly) assumed it was the work of Doyle Dane Bernbach, using a very minimalist layout to catch attention and evoke emotion, sort of like they did with the Polaroid ads in the ‘60s . No logo, just a simple headline, and an intriguing illustration that tells you nothing about the product, only the elation it will inspire in the woman in the your life. What an incredible way to portray a woman leaping into the arms of her man, I thought, showing only what’s necessary to imply the situation, spurring the reader to imagine the embrace, the eyes, the kiss.   Brilliant, I thought. Then I read the headline.    “Wear an Arrow Shirt and you'll simply sweep her off her feet!”   No.   No, I don’t believe this ad, even for a minute.    The only way to sell this scenario is if the emotion implied feels true. Even in 1949, it’s hard to imagine anyone got this excited about a dress shirt. Unless he just got home from the service and this is the first time in years
Read more